The 5-Second Trick For h4831sc load data
The 5-Second Trick For h4831sc load data
Blog Article
I picked up a 50ct. box of one hundred sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to burn off the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is fifty bullets. But I really need to locate a bullet from the a hundred and sixty class that my more mature rifle likes.
H4831 will get the job done while in the Swift although not true perfectly. You can expect to in no way have the pressures you will need for consistency Along with the .223. 760, or H414 are going to be better but for a few reason I ain't the largest supporter of most ball powders.
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I discovered this combo generates .5MOA groups with velocity about 3020fps outside of a 26" barrel. I use this identical powder in my 300wm shooting 180gr pills, so It is nice to get 1 powder for each.
With the 154 grain Hornady SP while in the 280, H4831 gave me good teams and very good velocity, but Rottweil R905 incorporates a drastically increased velocity and presents marginally greater precision. With Swift a hundred and fifty grain Sciroccos from the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave great precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally far better. Therefore, in Each and every of such cases I went with An additional powder, but I would definitely despise to divest myself of the H4831.
The only distinction as I are aware of it would be that the SC was intended to work as a result of powder measures improved (which it does). The more time grains do not feed properly in any way in certain measures. Thats my 02 :grin:
Because there does not seem like any "Formal" Load Data to choose from for this Load, can some of you provide a place to begin with this mixture and issues to think about when working this Load up?
If there h4831sc is not any load data it is actually mainly because this powder just isn't well suited for this cartridge. Commonly 1 will not likely discover 1 powder to suit all cartridges, as well as the household of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you're inquiring about isn't going to function.
excaliber reported: I've observed the exact opposite to generally be correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker h4831sc and equally correct powder in my three hundred Win Mag.
The main reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to take advantage of the temperature insensitivity of the Hodgdon Intense powder.
[email protected] gn and a hundred and fifteen CT's, I've killed additional Deer using this combo than the many rifles I individual blended, Work nearly this though the sweet location might be all around 54, I am a Two Bit-06 nut and I have some things tat performs really well for me if your fascinated
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, They are absolutely distinctive powders, with IMR 4831 being substantially quicker compared to Hodgdon variants. Will not handle them as the exact same powder, because they most absolutely are certainly not.
It really is probable that no additional dialogue is needed, during which case we endorse setting up a completely new thread. If even so you really feel your reaction is necessary you are able to nevertheless achieve this.
You could both: 1) Carry on and have the products outlined beneath automatically faraway from your procuring cart:
Not surprisingly, sitting all around for 20+ a long time h4831sc (I am aware a man who remains to be utilizing the H4831 he acquired from the 60s), ensures that melt away fees will most likely transform a smidge, and new manufacture things will probably be a little unique far too.